
Tech • AI • Robotics
Real-world testing in Sweden suggests Tesla Model 3 cars with CATL LFP batteries retain more capacity after 100,000 km than comparable versions using LG Chem NMC or Panasonic NCA packs.
Carla, a Swedish used-EV retailer, analyzed 9,954 battery tests conducted between 2022 and 2026 using Aviloo diagnostics. The method measures actual pack condition rather than relying on dashboard range estimates, giving a clearer picture of battery health after significant use.
After about 100,000 km, Tesla Model 3 cars fitted with CATL's LFP battery retained an average 93.34% of original capacity. That compared with 91.5% for the LG Chem NMC version, 89.8% for the Panasonic NCA 77.8 kWh pack, and 88.2% for the Panasonic 52.4 kWh pack. The spread between the strongest and weakest configurations exceeded five percentage points.
LFP cells are generally more tolerant of high states of charge and frequent charging to 100% than nickel-based chemistries. By contrast, Tesla typically recommends daily limits closer to 80% to 90% for many NMC and NCA packs. Over thousands of cycles, repeated time spent near full charge can materially affect long-term degradation.
The result is notable because LFP batteries are often seen mainly as a lower-cost, lower-energy-density option. In this data set, that cheaper chemistry delivered the best average battery health, challenging the assumption that the most expensive pack will necessarily last the longest in real-world use.
Broader fleet data points in the same direction. Geotab, in an analysis of more than 22,700 electric vehicles, found average battery degradation of about 1.8% per year. That figure varies with climate, mileage, charging behavior and thermal control, but it supports the view that EV batteries usually lose capacity slowly rather than failing at a fixed age.
Tesla has said Model 3 and Model Y long-range batteries lose roughly 15% of original capacity after 200,000 miles. A car originally rated for 300 miles would still offer about 255 miles under similar conditions at 85% capacity, indicating that substantial usable range can remain even after very high mileage.
Two cars of the same age can show very different battery condition depending on how they were used. Hot climates, long periods at very high charge, repeated deep discharge and frequent high-power charging can all accelerate aging, while milder temperatures and more moderate charging habits can slow it.
High-power DC fast charging increases thermal and electrical stress, especially when a battery is hot or charged close to full. Geotab found vehicles that frequently used fast charging above 100 kW showed degradation around 3.0% per year, though that does not mean every car using Superchargers will age at that rate. Temperature control and charging habits heavily influence the outcome.
EVs in hotter climates showed about 0.4 percentage points more degradation per year than vehicles in more moderate conditions, based on Geotab data. The same analysis found higher degradation when vehicles spent more than 80% of their time at very high or very low states of charge, underscoring that repeated stress over years matters more than any single charging session.
Battery chemistry alone does not determine longevity. The battery management system monitors voltage, current, temperature and charge level across thousands of cells, while thermal systems prepare the pack for fast charging and limit harmful conditions. That constant control helps explain why real-world battery life can differ widely even among similar vehicles.
The Swedish test results indicate that Tesla's CATL LFP packs may be a particularly durable choice for long-term Model 3 owners. They also reinforce a broader point: battery lifespan depends less on age alone than on chemistry, temperature, charging behavior and how effectively the vehicle manages them.
Explain this