
Tech • IA • Crypto
The new 1099-DA tax form marks a major shift in U.S. crypto reporting, improving oversight but creating widespread confusion due to incomplete data and inconsistent cost basis tracking.
The 1099-DA is a new tax form issued primarily by U.S.-based crypto exchanges such as Coinbase, Gemini, and Kraken. It reports crypto transaction proceeds to the IRS, similar to how the 1099-B works for stocks. However, in its current form, it often lacks complete cost basis data, limiting its usefulness for accurately calculating gains or losses.
For the 2025 tax year, the form mainly reports gross proceeds without including acquisition cost. This creates a distorted picture for the IRS, which may interpret transactions as fully taxable gains. Taxpayers must still reconstruct their cost basis independently, often across multiple platforms and wallets.
Unlike traditional brokerages, crypto platforms do not share data with each other. Assets frequently move between exchanges, wallets, and decentralized platforms, making it difficult for any single entity to track a full transaction history. This results in duplicated or missing records and forces taxpayers to reconcile data manually.
Determining cost basis is հատկապես difficult for long-time users who acquired crypto through mining, transfers, or multiple purchases. In some cases, taxpayers and accountants must estimate cost basis ranges when records are incomplete. Default IRS methods like FIFO may also produce suboptimal tax outcomes compared to specific identification strategies.
Despite the introduction of the 1099-DA, individuals remain responsible for accurate reporting. Failing to include all transactions—including those outside centralized exchanges—can trigger audits or penalties. Authorities emphasize that crypto tax obligations have existed since at least 2014, reducing the viability of ignorance as a defense.
The IRS has expanded its oversight using tools like John Doe summonses, requiring exchanges to provide bulk user data. This has led to more audits, automated notices, and even criminal investigations. In many cases, the IRS possesses more transaction data than taxpayers themselves, especially when platforms restrict access to historical records.
Many 1099-DA forms contain inaccuracies, including missing or incorrect cost basis and misclassified transactions. Some exchanges have even issued corrected forms after filing deadlines. These discrepancies often lead to IRS notices, requiring taxpayers to submit detailed reconciliations or amended returns.
Cases have emerged where taxpayers received large IRS bills due to incomplete reporting. For example, stablecoin transactions—typically neutral in value—have been treated as 100% gains when cost basis was absent. Resolving such disputes can require extensive documentation or even litigation.
Experts recommend always reporting figures shown on tax forms, even if incorrect, and reconciling discrepancies separately to avoid automated mismatch notices. Maintaining thorough records, using specialized crypto tax software, and working with professionals are key steps to reducing audit risk.
While the 1099-DA is intended to simplify crypto taxation, its current limitations are creating short-term disruption. Over time, regulators aim to expand reporting requirements to include full cost basis data, but gaps remain—particularly around decentralized finance platforms, which are not yet covered.
The 1099-DA represents progress toward standardized crypto tax reporting, but its incomplete implementation is increasing complexity and compliance burdens in the short term.