
Tech • IA • Crypto
The United States has moved to restrict imports of Chinese-made humanoid and quadruped robots, citing supply chain and security risks amid China’s dominance in the sector.
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has introduced limits on new imports of foreign-made humanoid robots and robotic systems, including quadruped “robot dogs.” FCC Chair Brendan Carr said the policy aims to “secure America’s critical supply chains” and reduce risks tied to connected devices embedded in infrastructure.
Chinese firms hold a commanding lead in the sector. Of roughly 15,000 humanoid robots shipped globally in 2025, companies such as Unitree and Agibot each delivered about 5,000 units, far outpacing US competitors like Tesla and Figure, which shipped only hundreds. China is estimated to control around 85% of the global humanoid robotics market.
Beijing has condemned the move as protectionist, and the restrictions are expected to heighten tensions ahead of a planned meeting between President Donald Trump and President Xi Jinping. The decision follows a broader pattern of US limits on Chinese technologies, including telecom and surveillance equipment.
US regulators argue that internet-connected robots could pose cybersecurity and surveillance risks if integrated into critical systems. The concern mirrors earlier actions against firms like Huawei, where foreign hardware in sensitive infrastructure was deemed a national security threat.
Unlike debates over Chinese AI models, the robotics restrictions have not triggered widespread opposition from US businesses. Few companies appear dependent on Chinese humanoid platforms, suggesting the domestic ecosystem is still nascent and less reliant on foreign suppliers.
The policy could benefit American developers such as Tesla’s Optimus and startups like Figure, which have raised billions in funding. However, analysts note that the industry’s main challenge remains creating profitable, real-world use cases in factories, homes, and logistics rather than regulatory barriers.
Even with restrictions, US firms still rely heavily on global components, including batteries, motors, and electronics often sourced from China. Some companies are pursuing hybrid models—assembling systems domestically while sourcing parts internationally—to maintain security oversight while managing costs.
The ban may complicate benchmarking and research, as US developers could face reduced access to leading Chinese systems for testing. At the same time, global competition will persist in international markets where both US and Chinese robots compete for deployment contracts.
The US crackdown on Chinese robotics imports reflects growing concern over security and technological dependence, while also signaling an effort to accelerate domestic capabilities in a rapidly evolving global industry.