
Tech • IA • Crypto
Apple launches a major legal offensive against OpenAI, accused of orchestrating the misappropriation of trade secrets in the race to build future AI devices.
Apple has filed a lawsuit, claiming that OpenAI ran a coordinated campaign to obtain confidential information about its upcoming products. Allegations include transfers of files, components, and technical schematics related to unannounced devices, amid intensifying competition around AI-powered hardware.
The filing targets Changlu, a former Apple employee who joined OpenAI, accused of keeping his work computer after leaving and downloading dozens of proprietary files. He allegedly encouraged other employees to share sensitive data and retained access to internal servers for several weeks.
Tang Tan, former Apple VP of product design and now head of hardware at OpenAI, is accused of soliciting confidential information during recruitment. He leads OpenAI’s consumer device efforts, notably after the acquisition of startup IO, founded with Jony Ive.
Apple claims OpenAI has hired over 400 of its employees in recent years. While legal, this large-scale movement fuels tensions, with Apple viewing it as a loss of critical know-how at a pivotal moment for the industry.
The dispute comes as tech giants race to define the next generation of devices. OpenAI is reportedly working on new AI-centric hardware that could compete with or replace the smartphone, a cornerstone of Apple’s model for nearly 20 years.
OpenAI denies the allegations, stating it has “no interest in other companies’ trade secrets” and is focused on its own innovations. The company emphasizes its goal of building technology accessible to the general public.
The clash recalls Apple’s past battles, notably against Google and Samsung, once accused of copying the iPhone. Those legal fights stretched over years, with major industrial stakes.
The case also raises internal questions: Apple allegedly delayed disabling the employee’s access and retrieving equipment. A software flaw may have allowed prolonged system access, weakening the company’s position.
The rapid rise of artificial intelligence is reshaping the sector’s balance. Apple, historically dominant, now faces players like OpenAI capable of redefining use cases. This strategic pressure may explain the firmness of its legal response.
Beyond the allegations, the case highlights a निर्णative power struggle between two visions of the tech future, where control of AI and the devices that run it is becoming central.